Political agreement has been reached between the European institutions (Council of Ministers, the Commission and the European Parliament) on the final text of the revised roaming regulation that was first proposed in 2011. You can followthis link to get the text of the original documents.
The new regulation will replace the original 2007 regulation on roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the Community. This set ceilings on the amounts that users could be charged for voice and text messages when travelling within Europe. The current maximum rates are 35 cents to make (and 11 to receive) a voice call and 11 cents to send a text message (free to receive). The 2007 regulation had no provision for data charges relating to Internet and email use although an amending Regulation adopted in 2009 set ceilings on the maximum wholesale data charges that operators could levy between themselves. Further amendments introduced following a number of well publicised cases of consumers receiving extremely high bills for such services required networks to set a ceiling of €60 (now to be reduced to €50) as the maximum charge a user might face in respect of data roaming – in the absence of contrary explicit agreement between the parties. Effectively further access would be blocked once the €60 figure was reached unless the consumer agreed to accept liability for further charges.
A Commission review of the working of the regulation was published in 2011 and was critical of a number of aspects of the working of the original regulation. In particular it was claimed that savings achieved by networks in the form of lower wholesale charges for data had not been passed on to consumers. In some cases, it was reported, retail rates were 7 times higher than wholesale charges. It was also found that there was only limited competition in the field and that roaming charges by all operators clustered around the ceiling levels.
From summer 2012, the revised regulation will reduce the voice and text charges still further and set also a ceiling on the charges which may be imposed for data roaming. From summer 2012 this will be 29 cents a minute for voice (8 cents to receive a call), 9 cents to send a text message and 70 cents per megabyte to download data. Data is to be charged on a per kilobyte basis. Further reductions are mandated with the result that by 2014 maximum charges will be reduced to 19 cents a minute to make a call (5 to receive), 6 cents to send a text message and 20 cents a megabyte for data. To put the latter figure into perspective, I have recently returned from a trip to Tanzania where the data roaming cost was notified as being £6 (almost €8) per megabyte. A 2 hour movie will typically be about 1gigabyte in size so downloading one on the Tanzanian roaming basis would cost about £6,000. Rather more than my air fare and hotel bill combined.
Even with the much lower charges planned in Europe for 2014, downloading movies when roaming will not be a cheap exercise with a gigabyte of data costing some €200. In an effort to establish more competitive markets the new Regulation aims to make it easier for consumers to bypass the roaming arrangements made by their home network and deal directly with other networks either in their own country or in in the countries that they are visiting. This provision will take effect in 2014 It has, of course, always been possible for consumers to enter directly into agreements with foreign networks although this has entailed the use of multiple SIM cards and telephone numbers. The regulation provides that consumers are to be enabled to retain their existing number when making such a switch.
Under the current Regulation, only mobile network operators are given the automatic right to conclude access agreements with each other. This means that, so called, virtual mobile networks such as those offered by supermarkets such as Tesco, are largely dependent on their host network provider, O2 in the case of Tesco. Under the new Regulation, virtual networks will also have the opportunity to conclude access agreements. This could result in a significant increase in the number of providers seeking agreements although experience under the current Regulation perhaps justifies a degree of scepticism as to whether there will be greater competition at the retail price level.
The new Regulation has not been well received by some mobile networks with suggestions that it amounts to excessive regulatory interference in a sector that is generally regarded as being highly competitive. In a speech at the World Mobile Congress in Madrid Vittorio Calao, chief executive officer of Vodafone, argued that:
Regulators should stop cutting mobile termination rates, pushing down roaming prices, building funny auctions which are designed to extract more money from existing operators, and resisting industry consolidation.
This is not a request for a moratorium on competition but a much stronger request for a moratorium on regulation.
Just as the mobile networks pleaded for a reduction in the level of regulation, there have been reports that the European Commission have started investigations into possible anti-competitivecollaboration between networks. I suspect this story may have a way to run but there is a difficult relationship between networks needing to cooperate in order to ensure global connectivity, the legitimate presentation of policy views shared at an industry level and potentially illegitimate levels of exchanges of information. This may be one to watch.
Both the stories are a bit too close to home for me to able to add any comments at the moment, sadly.
ReplyDeleteFascinating policy issues, though — to what extent should direct price regulation be permitted in a competitive market place, simply because it is not achieving what a regulator / state body considers desirable at the speed they would like...
It is indeed an interesting question how far regulators should interfere with business models that do not appear to be inherently uncompetitive. In a slightly different field we are having the argument about whether broadband access should be incorporated in universal service obligations or whether the market can provide.
ReplyDeleteIt is perhaps interesting that the wholesale rate for data roaming has been capped at 50 cents from 2009. Checking back on my travels, I have invariably been offered data at £3 per megabyte (with O2). That does seem quite a mark up but if O2 decide that they want to put efforts into attracting UK calls and are not really interested in roaming, that is perhaps a matter for them. The problem, perhaps is that all of the mobile networks seem to be following a similar strategy. part of my legal brain says 'concerted practice'.
There is another point which probably relates to the IP module. I took my iPad with me to Tanzania so I could watch videos on the plane and in the hotel.The iPad has no USB or similar port. I had bought a number of DVDs (quite legitimately) and the only way I could view them on the iPad was by copying them to my computer, loading them into ITunes and downloading to the iPad. I must admit that I am not too sure about the legality but what are the options? I don't think that the discs I wanted are available legitimately on line Maybe another example of the issues between hardware producers (Apple) and the copyright industries. Even if the materials were available for one time streaming in Tanzania, would it be reasonable to expect me to pay £6,000 in roaming charges?
Any thoughts?
part of my legal brain says 'concerted practice'
ReplyDeleteOr else "what the market will bear"!
Maybe another example of the issues between hardware producers (Apple) and the copyright industries
This is an interesting example to me since, if the copyright industries should be grateful to anyone, it is Apple! Without iTunes, I am not sure where digital music would be — would we all be buying CDs still?
would it be reasonable to expect me to pay £6,000 in roaming charges?
That seems a bit of a loaded question, to me, given that, in this situation, you chose to route the traffic back via a UK mobile network?
I haven't looked into it a great deal, but it seems that an Internet bundle via tiGo would be £6 for 1.2GB; this would seem far more suitable, even if you had to add on a small amount for routing the traffic back through the UK, to get a UK IP address to permit the streaming if the program in question was not licensed for streaming in Africa.
I am rather fearful of the effects of tinkering with one aspect (or worse, I guess, multiple aspects!) of an industry's pricing structure, where that industry has high capital and operational costs, including the purchase of a right to use the radio waves from the government at a rather high sum...
the only way I could view them on the iPad was by copying them to my computer, loading them into ITunes and downloading to the iPad. I must admit that I am not too sure about the legality
Woe betide anyone recommending you to do it!
I suppose also, if one were feeling less charitable, whether one might question if, rather than an iPad, with limited expansion, a £60 portable DVD player might have avoid the cost, and mitigated the (already minimal, in my view) legal risk. For £60, all problems solved.
ReplyDeleteOther than the battery life.
And scratching the disks.
And the weight.
And the smaller screen.
Good points.
ReplyDeleteI used wifi in Tanzania although at speeds approaching 500k it was not a real option. I know you can buy data bundles locally but after teaching from 8-6 I was not inclined to head off into the African night. The people are lovely but the drivers are awful.
There are items such as my DVDs which are only available for sale in that format. There are other items which are available (only?) through media such as ITunes. My point is that we do need to think about some of the fundamental issues.
ReplyDeleteMy point is that we do need to think about some of the fundamental issues.
Oh — I agree absolutely. Whether a personal use right would be the solution, I'm not sure — it feels like a sticking plaster to me.
However, I'm even less sure that we need to consider direct price regulation of mobile tariffs. Perhaps if I didn't work in the industry, I might think differently, although part of me thinks that direct price regulation is not an appropriate response in any context. Regulating
I'd be interested in your thoughts on digital downloads — it strikes me that the cost of each download far, far exceeds the cost of production, if that's the basis of the roaming regulation, and so are in need of lowering. Likewise, the cost of downloads has not changed over the last few years, and yet one would have expected market forces to drive the price down. It also seems that I'm paying the same for downloads as I do for CDs, which also seems to make little sense.
I'm not sure what the solution might be for roaming costs, though. It seems that forcing the mobile operators' prices down, whilst still wanting them to roll out LTE and continue to innovate, might not be a sensible approach. If the pricing change is forced on communications terminating outside Europe too, there could be considerable impact on countries which terminate a lot of calls, and benefit from a revenue share — the less money to share, the less they get, I'd have thought.